March 28, 2002

Cate, Liv, Adaptation, etc.
Lhunrogiel V.

I must admit that I was challenged by Cate Blanchett's interpretation of Galadriel. But I really wanted to approve of it, so that got me thinking.

In the book, Galadriel is a gentler character. However, I think that Tolkien clearly draws a distinction between "nice" and "good". Remember Sam's comment after he and Frodo meet the Wood Elves? "It's as if it doesn't matter if I approve of them or not," something like that. The Elves are wise and good, but not touchy-feely. They do the right thing. So Galadriel, as a powerful Elf struggling with a difficult choice, will not tell Frodo what he wants to hear in this desperate time, but what she knows he needs to hear and do. OK?

And Liv Tyler. I think she's fine as Arwen. And I don't think she'll dominate the next films. Check out the movie companion: she mentions having to wait for Aragorn. I think that indicates she won't be going to war in ROTK.
One of the great things about the Aragorn-Arwen relationship is how loyal and faithful the two remain to each other, even when they're separated for decades at a time. I hope Jackson retains that in the movies.

I loved FOTR...I think the adaptation works without sacrificing the story. I have friends who think it's an abomination, but I think that can come out of too much of a devotion to EXACTLY WHAT TOLKIEN WROTE. How about what Tolkien MEANT? He wanted to give the world a story of love, hope, courage, and friendship in an age of undying cynicism and apathy. If the movie conveys the same message, then it does its job and follows in Tolkien's footsteps. He gives all Catholics a good name!